FOR INDIVIDUALS
Recognise the Judgement Gap in yourself?
For professionals who've been handed AI tools without the framework to use them well. A structured pathway to close your own gap, built on cyberpsychology and twenty-five years of professional practice.
The self-check
01 Could you explain and defend an AI-assisted decision you made this week?
02 Have you checked an AI output against your own expertise recently, or trusted it because it sounded right?
03 Do you know what you’d do differently if the tool were taken away tomorrow?
START HERE
Human in the Lead
A two-hour bootcamp: why the AI conversation has been framed wrong, what AI does to your thinking, and how to orient before opening a tool.
£199
GO DEEPER
Close your own gap
Four modules covering decision frameworks, interrogating outputs, understanding workflows, and protecting yourself. Self-directed, with accountability.
!COMING SOON!
Where are you on the Curve?
The Judgement Curve runs from grounded competence to judgement advantage, and most fluent AI users sit at Stage 3, confident dependency, without knowing it. The bootcamp locates you: the calibration self-check shows where your feedback loops have thinned, which is another way of saying where you stand on the Curve. The destination is Stage 5, judgement advantage: knowing what to delegate, what to retain, and how to spot the plausible failure in a fluent output. The bootcamp is where the route starts.
What you get
A practice-based pathway, not a video course: a cohort WhatsApp group, live accountability sessions, and Chatham House rules throughout, no recordings. The focus stays on judgement, not on features.
Free masterclass
The Judgement Gap: why confidence and competence drift apart. Forty-five minutes, live, free, run periodically on Maven. Not sure yet? Start here
THE RIGHT FIRST STEP
A considered conversation, not a sales call.
If you are working through an AI governance or adoption challenge, a scoping conversation will tell you whether this work fits the problem you actually have.
About Sonya
Cyberpsychologist with twenty-five years in health communications, who built this methodology in high-stakes clinical and policy settings.
Read full bio here
“These sessions have been so helpful. I now want to put more energy into refining my critical thinking than worrying about AI and my job.”
ICS Intro into AI session participant, March 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
-
The judgement gap is not something most professionals notice in themselves — that is what makes it significant. Three questions help locate it: Can you explain and defend an AI-assisted decision you made this week? Have you checked a recent AI output against your own expertise, or accepted it because it sounded right? Do you know what you would do differently if the tool were taken away tomorrow? Difficulty answering any of these with confidence is a reliable indicator that a gap has begun to open.
-
The Judgement Curve is a five-stage model developed by Sonya Cullington that maps how professional judgement changes through sustained AI use. The stages are: Grounded Competence (your pre-AI baseline), Assisted Acceleration (early adoption, where AI genuinely extends your capability), Confident Dependency (fluent use, but with declining verification, where most professionals currently sit), Deliberate Recalibration (friction reintroduced, oversight rebuilt), and Judgement Advantage (AI extends rather than substitutes for your judgement). The majority of regular AI users are at Stage 3 without knowing it.
-
Human in the Lead is a two-hour bootcamp for individual professionals who want to understand what AI is actually doing to their thinking and what to do about it. It covers why the mainstream conversation about AI adoption has been framed incorrectly, the specific psychological effects of regular AI use on cognition and professional judgement, and how to develop a pre-tool orientation that keeps you in the lead rather than following the system. It costs £199 and is available via Maven.
-
No. The aim is not reduced AI use, it is better AI use. Professionals who understand how AI affects their cognition use it more effectively, not less. They know when to rely on AI output, when to interrogate it, and when to override it. That capacity, calibrated trust, is what separates professionals who extend their capability through AI from those who quietly outsource their judgement to it.
-
The Judgement Gap: why confidence and competence drift apart is a free 45-minute live session run periodically on Maven. It introduces the Judgement Curve, explains the psychological mechanisms behind judgement erosion, and gives participants a clear picture of where they are likely to be on the Curve. It is the right starting point if you want to understand the framework before committing to a paid programme.
-
The individual programmes are designed for professionals who use AI tools regularly as part of their work and are accountable for the quality of their output; knowledge workers, clinicians, analysts, advisors, communications professionals, and anyone whose role requires independent judgement that AI is now involved in shaping. They are particularly relevant for people who have noticed a nagging uncertainty about whether they are using AI well, or who want to protect their professional expertise as AI becomes more embedded in their field.
-
Close Your Own Gap is a four-module self-directed programme currently in development. It covers decision frameworks for AI use, techniques for interrogating AI outputs against your own expertise, understanding your specific workflow dependencies on AI, and building personal protection against judgement erosion. The programme runs with a cohort WhatsApp group and live accountability sessions, under Chatham House rules with no recordings. It is designed for professionals who want structured, sustained support rather than a one-off session.